with regard to the employer, it would be extremely costly to require businesses to retrain and rehire new workers every 2 years. No employer I am aware of would think it satisfactory for an employee to take a 1-year so-called break every couple of years. Each of us in the Senate employs people in our offices, here in the Capitol and our home States. This would be an unacceptable condition for us, and I am sure it would be for any employer. Businesses would have to hire other workers to take over for the leaving guest worker, would have to invest time and money in retraining additional staff. This would be extremely burdensome, particularly on small businesses. From an economic standpoint, I believe it generally does not make sense to enact laws that cause instability in the workforce and create requirements that unnecessarily impose significant costs on our small businesses. I am not an economist, but this does not seem to be a sensible way for us to do business.
Jeff Bingaman: “with regard to the employer, it would be extremely costly to require businesses to retrain and rehire new workers every…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the economic impact of workforce retraining requirements on small businesses.
Share
More from Jeff Bingaman
We believe the bill that Senator Bingaman has prepared represents a very useful starting point for an important discussion.
in 1981, in his first inaugural address, President Reagan said: Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. I came to the Senate 2 years later in 1983 with the firm belief that in most cases his statement was…
Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) requested agency information on the amount of EAJA fees paid out by the U.S. Forest Service from 1999 through 2005.
He knows the crucial role that Congress plays in setting policy and in overseeing how that policy is carried out.





