My own view would be we clearly have in the Senate for well over a century now delegated the initial responsibility for reviewing judges to the members of the Judiciary Committee. I would suggest the President should be consulting with members of the Judiciary Committee, both Republicans and Democrats, and if he determines he can't get a single Democrat on the Judiciary Committee to support his nominee, that should be a signal to him he should find a nominee who could be supported by Democrats, as well as Republicans. It is true the Democrats are in the minority at this point. But a great many Members of this body are Democrats and a great many members of the Judiciary Committee are Democrats. If to a person they are opposed to the nominee after they learn of the qualifications and the positions taken by the nominee, I think that is a signal to the President he should find someone else. Clearly, that is not the course he has chosen to follow.
Jeff Bingaman: “My own view would be we clearly have in the Senate for well over a century now delegated the initial responsibility for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nomination process for judges and the role of the Judiciary Committee.
Share
More from Jeff Bingaman
this is an amendment offered by myself and cosponsored by Senators Webb and Wyden. It would provide for the approval of an agreement between the United States and the Republic of Palau in response to Supertyphoon Bopha. Few people are…
I ask unanimous consent that further reading of the amendment be dispensed with. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so ordered. The amendment is as follows: (Purpose: To provide for the approval of an agreement…
in 1981, in his first inaugural address, President Reagan said: Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. I came to the Senate 2 years later in 1983 with the firm belief that in most cases his statement was…





