On the recordJanuary 31, 1994
No, it is not. We are not talking about anybody on the job. We are talking about what has been proposed by a majority of two on the Foreign Relations Committee, are we not?
Source
govinfo.govWilliam Helms: “No, it is not. We are not talking about anybody on the job. We are talking about what has been proposed by a majority of…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing a proposal from the Foreign Relations Committee.
Share
More from William Helms
Dec 7, 2001
Mr. President, there is a little bit of manipulation going on, but let me emphasize the President of the United States is in favor of the underlying amendment, to which a second-degree amendment proposes to gut the amendment I have just…
Oct 2, 2001
On behalf of the 2.7 million members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States and its Ladies Auxiliary, I want to express our strong support for amendment number 1690 to the National Defense Authorization Act, S. 1438, the…
Oct 2, 2002
I thank all Senators who have been so kind this morning. I have been sitting here at this desk wondering who on Earth is this Helms fellow whom my colleagues keep talking about. To be sure, there are newspaper editors in North Carolina who…
Oct 2, 2001
I thank the Chair. We have a responsibility as Senators to enact an insurance policy for our troops and our officials--such as Secretary of State Powell--to protect them from a U.N. Kangaroo Court where the United States has no veto. That…
Other voices in this conversation
