The Helms amendment has been permanent law since 1973, the year after I came to the Senate. It is a narrow restriction on how funds provided by the American taxpayers can be used. It is not a restriction on the actions of private groups--for example, International Planned Parenthood Federation--that receive funding provided by the taxpayers of this country. A group may use Federal funds for administrative expenses, distributions of condoms, or to pay for, if you can believe it, family planning radio soap operas and gender analysis tool kits, whatever they are. Simultaneously, funds available to these same groups from other sources can and often do pay for abortion or pro-abortion lobbying efforts. It goes without saying when the U.S. Government pays for administrative and other expenses of these groups, funds from other sources are freed up for activities that otherwise would be a violation of U.S. law.
William Helms: “The Helms amendment has been permanent law since 1973, the year after I came to the Senate. It is a narrow restriction…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Helms amendment during a Senate debate on foreign assistance.
Share
More from William Helms
our friend and distinguished colleague, Strom Thurmond, has a lost a dear member of his Senate Family. Holly Richardson's courageous battle with breast cancer ended early Monday morning. I do not use the word courageous lightly; if there…
during my almost 30 years in the Senate, I have been honored to welcome dozens of remarkably gifted guest Chaplains. Today's guest Chaplain, Anne Graham Lotz, of Raleigh, NC, my hometown, is one of North Carolina's most distinguished…
I have worked with our colleague from Georgia, Senator Miller, to craft legislation to protect our soldiers and officials from illegitimate prosecutions by the International Criminal Court. Senator Miller and I and Senators Lott, Warner…
Mr. President, there is a little bit of manipulation going on, but let me emphasize the President of the United States is in favor of the underlying amendment, to which a second-degree amendment proposes to gut the amendment I have just…





