The holding from the court overturning the New York City Schools' condom policy decreed: The petitioner parents are being compelled by State authority to send their children into an environment where they will be permitted, even encouraged, to obtain a contraceptive device, which the parents disfavor as a matter of private belief. Because the Constitution gives the parents the right to regulate their children's sexual behavior as best they can, not only must a compelling State interest be found supporting the need for the policy at issue, but that policy must be essential to serving that interest as well. We do not find that the policy is essential.
William Helms: “The holding from the court overturning the New York City Schools' condom policy decreed: The petitioner parents are…”
Editor's note · Context
Helms discusses a New York court ruling that overturned a condom distribution program in schools.
Share
More from William Helms
Of course, on behalf of the people of North Carolina, I thank her. I will say that the southeastern part of North Carolina and northeastern part of South Carolina, the people in both areas, as the saying goes, are living on a diet of…
These groups support John Bolton because of his political views, because of his political expertise, and because of, yes, his personal moral principles. John Bolton is precisely the kind of citizen the United States desperately needs in…
Is it not correct that the Senate, with only one dissenting vote, approved, in October 1999, $81 million in payments to farmers, but the House refused to follow the Senate's action because North Carolina tobacco farmers would benefit?
The Commission by law had two goals: to study how to protect the important government secrets while simultaneously reducing the enormous amount of classified documents and materials. We began our deliberations with the premise that…





