I must unalterably oppose because the United States has never, never agreed to tactical nuclear weapons reductions with the Russians, or the Soviets, for good reason. First, these weapons are essential to an equitable sharing of the risk and burden associated with NATO's nuclear mission. Further, they are a visible sign that NATO is prepared to use any and all force necessary to deter an attack. Finally, there is absolutely no way that the United States can verify Russian compliance with an agreement to eliminate tactical nuclear weapons. Mr. President, I am increasingly fascinated by the wailing, tearing of hair, and gnashing of teeth engaged in by the more liberal of our brethren, the news media, and otherwise, regarding the impact that NATO expansion would have on the United States-Russian relationship.
William Helms: “I must unalterably oppose because the United States has never, never agreed to tactical nuclear weapons reductions with…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Conrad amendment related to tactical nuclear weapons during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from William Helms
my amendment will clarify once and for all any question about rats, mice and birds used for medical research under the Animal Welfare Act. Approval of this amendment will make sure that none of the important work taking place in the…
this morning marked an unmistakably glorious conclusion to the remarkable military career of one of North Carolina's most famous citizens, GEN Henry H. Shelton. It occurred at Fort Myer, VA, with scores of America's best-known…
God blessed this Nation with an abundance of natural resources and places of unmatched natural beauty. I am so glad that as a Nation we have set aside portions of our land for the enjoyment of the American people and have preserved our…
roads in national parks are vital pieces of economic infrastructure that fuel the engines of economic growth. In fact, the National Park Service itself recognizes as much on its Web site. Let me quote: ``Recreation travel accounts for 20…





