Is it not correct that the Senate, with only one dissenting vote, approved, in October 1999, $81 million in payments to farmers, but the House refused to follow the Senate's action because North Carolina tobacco farmers would benefit?
William Helms: “Is it not correct that the Senate, with only one dissenting vote, approved, in October 1999, $81 million in payments to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Senate's approval of payments to farmers and the House's refusal.
Share
More from William Helms
For too long the government has classified information which has no business being classified. When I came to the Senate, I was a member of the Armed Services Committee and I remember that I went to many classified briefings, only to be…
I must confess that I myself have long been alarmed by America's drift away from the moral and spiritual principles and priorities upon which our nation was founded more than two centuries ago.
Maybe the Senator would read my lips, as the statement goes. Nothing in here kicks in unless the United Nations engages in, during the fiscal year, ``* * * any effort to develop, advocate, promote or publicize any proposal concerning…
But 400,000 of these highly armed, mean-as-a-snake troops, terrorizing their own citizens and locking up, as the Senator from North Carolina pointed out, the duly elected leader of this country in internationally supervised, Western-style…





