On the recordFebruary 25, 1887
Upon the whole it does not appear, as a business proposition, that the building proposed should be undertaken.
Source
presidency.ucsb.eduEditor's note · Context
Veto Message
Share & report
More from Orestes Cleveland
May 18, 1896
I suppose no one would suggest the renewal of such pension during the lifetime of her second husband.
May 28, 1896
I herewith return without approval House bill No. 900, entitled 'An act to provide for the payment of the claim of William H. Mahoney.'
May 25, 1896
It is quite plain that in fairness and justice no appropriation should be made in favor of the claimant.
Other voices in this conversation
