On the recordOctober 16, 1888
Upon the merits as the case now stands, and because of the mistake in describing the relationship of the beneficiary, this bill, I think, should not become a law.
Source
presidency.ucsb.eduEditor's note · Context
Veto Message
Share & report
More from Orestes Cleveland
Jun 5, 1896
It is well known that the business of insurance is entered upon with the expectation that the premiums received will pay all losses and yield a profit to the insurance in addition.
Jun 5, 1896
I regret that I am constrained to disapprove an important appropriation bill so near the close of the present session of Congress.
May 29, 1896
I herewith return without approval House bill No. 4526, entitled 'An act granting a pension to Jonathan Scott.'
Jun 5, 1896
I can not gather from the facts I have been able to collect concerning this appropriation that it is justified on any ground.
Other voices in this conversation
