Can you guarantee that the Committee will receive a detailed and substantive response to our May 25th letter, that was a long time ago, by July 6th from Attorney General Garland himself and not from a delegate, not from one of his delegates.
Editor's note · Context
Van Drew demands a direct response from Attorney General Garland regarding a previous letter.
Share & report
More from Jeff Van Drew
Mr. Speaker, some things never change. I woke up today and thanked God the sky was blue. There was traffic, lots of traffic, in Washington, D.C., and once again, Democrats are trying to take away appliances from hardworking Americans. They…
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, thank you for having this hearing. It is valuable. It is worthwhile, and I know it is only the very, very rudimentary beginning, but it is still good.
I am excited that my proposed amendment to make the FAA Technical Center permanent and, more specifically, dedicated to advanced aerospace, has been enshrined into law as well.
Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New Jersey will be postponed. Amendment No. 63 Offered by Mr. Van Drew The Acting…





