The problem is that it would be a very minimal sentence, if it was a sentence at all, a very minimal fine. And the difference is the draconian aspects of this legislation, which says that you go to jail for a year and a half simply for sitting in front of the door or on a sidewalk. That does not comport with what I thought American law is all about in terms of justice. And the problem with this legislation is that it blurs the distinction between violence, which I absolutely abhor, and with nonviolent civil disobedience, which has been the hallmark, the staple of every single human rights, civil rights movement in this country.
Chris Smith: “The problem is that it would be a very minimal sentence, if it was a sentence at all, a very minimal fine. And the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of legislation on civil disobedience during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Chris Smith
I wish to underscore my strong support of H. Res. 837 introduced by Mr. Moylan, our colleague from Guam, on Reaffirming Ties Between the United States and the Philippines. It is both timely and critical, as we see the People's Liberation…
I would add that the gentlewoman's husband, Scott, is a tremendous leader and head of National Right to Life.
I thank my good friend for yielding and for his leadership and that of my colleague on the other side of the aisle. Mr. Speaker, it all started in September 1997, 27 years ago, with Brick Township, New Jersey, parents Bobbie and Billy…
The funds emanate from Russian-backed oligarchs, including Mr. Shor, who you mentioned in your opening statement.





