I mean, think about the practicality of it is that a president could literally do anything. And if he wasn't impeached and removed for it, he escapes all type of criminal or civil/legal liability. It doesn't make any sense.
Chris Christie argues against the notion of presidential immunity, highlighting the practical implications of such a claim.
Share
More from Chris Christie
This is an embarrassing episode for the Department of Justice [that] further undercuts the public confidence in our system of justice.
This is against type for him. I'm sure it was a difficult decision. I think his analysis was, he cannot live with a nuclear weapon in Iran, and Israel did all of the heavy lifting.
An embarrassing episode for the Department of Justice [that] further undercuts the public confidence in our system of justice.
“For our party’s sake, if we do a lot of losing six weeks from today, I wonder whether we’re going to say, OK, we need to change this approach and change this kind of wing of the party from being the dominant wing and having a different…
Other voices in this conversation
