This is not going to be a diminishment for States. This is just going to be a right-sizing of the fleet. What I am concerned about is if we don't pass amendments such as this, where the administration has asked for it, where all of the data supports that we don't need to keep the level at 316, and where we can save $1.2 billion by doing it, how can we then ask our military to make significant reductions if we don't allow them to take such commonsense action such as this? Mr. McCAIN. I thank the Senator from New Hampshire, and I hope we can dispose of this amendment. I don't know if a recorded vote would be required by any of the Members, but I hope we can voice vote it. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Michigan.
On the recordNovember 17, 2011
Share & report
More from Kelly Ayotte
Jul 13, 2016
Are you aware of ANY U.S. government activities helping Iran protect its nuclear program against sabotage?
Nov 28, 2016
It just strikes me as that there was a very lack of communication here in a way that has pretty significant implications.
Nov 28, 2016
Consistent with the Principles of Excellence, the revised [memorandum of understanding] requires educational institutions to provide meaningful information about the financial cost and quality of their programs so that military students…
Sep 28, 2016
Mr. President, today I wish to speak on the importance of passing legislation to address a serious issue that impacts New Hampshire, New England, and the rest of the country each year, the issue of Lyme and other tick-borne diseases. This…





