Political Quotes

On the recordSeptember 10, 2001
The argument that our former POWs have already been compensated under the War Claims Act and 1951 peace treaty is ridiculous, to be candid about it. POWs who were enslaved by private Japanese corporations received next to nothing in compensation. Many POWs received nothing--nothing, zippo. A Federal judge who dismissed many of the lawsuits wrote in his opinion--listen to this: The immeasurable bounty of life for themselves and their posterity in a free society services the debt. That is what he said. If that is not a ridiculous statement, even if it did come from a judge, I have never heard one. Here it is again: The immeasurable bounty of life for themselves [POWs] and their posterity in a free society services the debt. It is true under the War Claims Act POWs could receive minimal compensation--a dollar a day--for their claims against the acts of powers. They could not be compensated for claims against private corporations and nationals who were not agents. I want to make it clear to my colleagues that a treaty that is signed between the United States and another government that says that a U.S. citizen cannot sue another U.S. citizen--excuse me, another citizen in a foreign country without due process--it is wrong. You can't do that. You cannot deny due process.
Said by
Jeremiah Smith
Federalist · New Hampshire

Editor's note · Context

Addressing compensation for former POWs during a discussion on the War Claims Act.

Share

More from Jeremiah Smith

Jun 19, 2002

This concurrent receipt issue centers around the ability of a military retiree to receive both military retired pay and their VA disability. The American Legion and VFW point out that the concept of concurrent receipts goes all the way…

govinfo.gov
Jun 12, 2002

by now, most everyone in the Nation has heard of the problems caused by MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether). I am very pleased that S. 950, the Federal Reformulated Fuels Act of 2002, reported by the Senate Committee on Environment and…

govinfo.gov
Mar 8, 2002

the final item I rise to discuss involves another nomination, but not for the judiciary. It is the nomination of Joe Schmitz. I have already submitted a statement for the Record, but I want to say this in the Chamber because I believe…

govinfo.gov
Nov 20, 2002

Senator Lott, if you would yield for just a second, I thank you for your friendship and your leadership. I am glad to see you back in the majority. I know you will make good use of it. I will miss not being here to help you, but I will be…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation