The argument that our former POWs have already been compensated under the War Claims Act and 1951 peace treaty is ridiculous, to be candid about it. POWs who were enslaved by private Japanese corporations received next to nothing in compensation. Many POWs received nothing--nothing, zippo. A Federal judge who dismissed many of the lawsuits wrote in his opinion--listen to this: The immeasurable bounty of life for themselves and their posterity in a free society services the debt. That is what he said. If that is not a ridiculous statement, even if it did come from a judge, I have never heard one. Here it is again: The immeasurable bounty of life for themselves [POWs] and their posterity in a free society services the debt. It is true under the War Claims Act POWs could receive minimal compensation--a dollar a day--for their claims against the acts of powers. They could not be compensated for claims against private corporations and nationals who were not agents. I want to make it clear to my colleagues that a treaty that is signed between the United States and another government that says that a U.S. citizen cannot sue another U.S. citizen--excuse me, another citizen in a foreign country without due process--it is wrong. You can't do that. You cannot deny due process.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing compensation for former POWs during a discussion on the War Claims Act.
Share
More from Jeremiah Smith
This concurrent receipt issue centers around the ability of a military retiree to receive both military retired pay and their VA disability. The American Legion and VFW point out that the concept of concurrent receipts goes all the way…
by now, most everyone in the Nation has heard of the problems caused by MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether). I am very pleased that S. 950, the Federal Reformulated Fuels Act of 2002, reported by the Senate Committee on Environment and…
the final item I rise to discuss involves another nomination, but not for the judiciary. It is the nomination of Joe Schmitz. I have already submitted a statement for the Record, but I want to say this in the Chamber because I believe…
Senator Lott, if you would yield for just a second, I thank you for your friendship and your leadership. I am glad to see you back in the majority. I know you will make good use of it. I will miss not being here to help you, but I will be…





