With all due respect, the Senator misunderstands my amendment, because that is not what my amendment does. You just articulated the policy that you supported. Even if your side would lose in the debate that we would have in Congress--let's say we have the debate. If your side lost, the money would still be released. If my side loses --I happen to favor withdrawal--if I lost, the money would still be released. All my amendment calls for is a vote. It doesn't say that if we vote to get out on March 31 that the money is not released. The money is still released. This is on the Senator's time. He has been very generous. The only conclusion I can draw is the Senator just doesn't want a vote in the Congress at all.
Jeremiah Smith: “With all due respect, the Senator misunderstands my amendment, because that is not what my amendment does. You just…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to funding and withdrawal during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Jeremiah Smith
by now, most everyone in the Nation has heard of the problems caused by MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether). I am very pleased that S. 950, the Federal Reformulated Fuels Act of 2002, reported by the Senate Committee on Environment and…
I am outraged with the decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional because it contains the words ``Under God.'' The pledge is part of the fabric of our society, a wonderful tradition…
the final item I rise to discuss involves another nomination, but not for the judiciary. It is the nomination of Joe Schmitz. I have already submitted a statement for the Record, but I want to say this in the Chamber because I believe…
I support the Hutchison- Bingaman amendment and am pleased to cosponsor it. The purpose of my addressing the issue is two fold: One, to impress upon my fellow Members that if Congress intends to have input into the BRAC process, the only…





