I rise today to again support the President in his duty, I believe, to stop Iraq from bringing weapons of mass destruction throughout the world. The warmonger is Saddam Hussein. He is now moving us toward another major military engagement with the stakes even higher than they were 12 years ago. Unfortunately, Desert Storm did not finish the job. Given the data and facts President Bush had at the time and with the U.N. resolution, he did what he had to do. If we calculate the costs of air operations, no-fly zones, and other activities over these past 12 years, containment has not worked. In this age of weapons of mass destruction, relying on a policy of containment and deterrence is a risk we cannot and must not take.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for military action against Iraq and supporting President Bush's stance on weapons of mass destruction.
Share
More from Jeremiah Smith
in March of this year, when we passed the energy bill, Senator Voinovich offered an amendment to reauthorize the Price-Anderson Act that passed overwhelmingly 78-21. The Price-Anderson Act expires on August 1, 2002. This act sets up a…
Support for lifting this mandate comes from both the left and right--the Rutherford Institute, which sued the Air Force on behalf of Lt. Col. McSally, to the National Council of Women's Organizations, an umbrella organization which now…
I call it the broadcast fraud amendment. It simply prohibits the broadcasting of certain false information on election day. Unfortunately, this amendment is necessary to strengthen Federal prohibitions on the broadcast of false election…
Another letter from a man from my home State, a Mr. Lutz, who said: Eight out of ten members of the Senate have cosponsored S. 170 . . . which would permit retired members of the Armed Forces who have service-connected disability to…





