I rise to support the committee and to support the 2-year delay in the BRAC process and oppose the Kennedy amendment. Why? Number one, BRAC's estimated costs are $15 billion and savings are not expected to be realized until at least 2011. These funds can be better used to equip our Humvees or pay hazard duty pay for members of our military or any other function today in winning the war on terror. Furthermore, the dynamics of the 2005 BRAC process are very different from previous rounds. There will not be a requisite force structure reduction as before. Our military will have to do the same or more in the future on a smaller footprint, with a smaller industrial base and with fewer critical assets. These assets cannot be reconstituted. BRAC will result in the permanent loss and knowledge of skills and industrial capacity. I urge my colleagues to support the committee and oppose the amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the BRAC process and its implications for military funding and capacity.
Share
More from Jeb Bradley
I start out again by thanking my friend from Colorado for his work on this bill. Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 3082, as amended, the Veterans Small Business and Memorial Affairs Act of 2006. Title I of this bill improves…
I have sent an amendment to the desk to authorize $300,000 from the State Department's salaries and expenses account for the recruitment and training of Hispanic-Americans in the Foreign Service. Our diplomats are America's face to the…
I too rise with my colleague from Minnesota and my colleague from Rhode Island to speak about ``Recovery Month'' and what it means for individuals and what it means for our country as a whole. But, Mr. Speaker, today I would like to focus…
that story was in the Washington Post just after I returned from Iraq. It was about 40 or 45 young high school students. We all do crazy things when we are young, but graffiti should not be a reason that one gets executed. But we saw that…





