All the repeal did was to relieve the statute book of an objectionable enactment, unconstitutional in effect and injurious in terms to a large portion of the States.
Franklin Pierce: “All the repeal did was to relieve the statute book of an objectionable enactment, unconstitutional in effect and…”
Editor's note · Context
Pierce argues that the repeal removed an unconstitutional law that harmed many states.
Share
More from Franklin Pierce
The minimum of Federal government compatible with the maintenance of national unity and efficient action in our relations with the rest of the world should afford the rule and measure of construction of our powers under the general clauses…
When the honor or the rights of our country require it to assume a hostile attitude, it confidently relies upon the patriotism of its citizens, not ordinarily devoted to the military profession, to augment the Army and the Navy so as to…
There is no condemnation which the voice of freedom will not pronounce upon us should we prove faithless to this great trust.
The object of that war was to disenthrall the united colonies from foreign rule, which had proved to be oppressive, and to separate them permanently from the mother country.





