We steadily deny that at the date of the treaty Great Britain had any possessions there other than the limited and peculiar establishment at the Balize, and maintain that if she had any they were surrendered by the convention.
Franklin Pierce: “We steadily deny that at the date of the treaty Great Britain had any possessions there other than the limited and…”
Editor's note · Context
He maintains that at the time of the treaty, Great Britain had no possessions in the area beyond a limited establishment, which was surrendered by the convention.
Share
More from Franklin Pierce
In war between that power and the United States, without resort on our part to our mercantile marine the means of our enemy to inflict injury upon our commerce would be tenfold greater than ours to retaliate.
Our present attitude and past course give assurances, which should not be questioned, that our purposes are not aggressive nor threatening to the safety and welfare of other nations.
Public affairs ought to be so conducted that a settled conviction shall pervade the entire Union that nothing short of the highest tone and standard of public morality marks every part of the administration and legislation of the General…
And then both reason and right combine not merely to justify but to require its repeal.





