Those provisions were but the occasion, or the pretext, of an agitation which was inherent in the nature of things.
Franklin Pierce: “Those provisions were but the occasion, or the pretext, of an agitation which was inherent in the nature of things.”
Editor's note · Context
Pierce asserts that the agitation was inherent to the situation, rather than caused by specific legal provisions.
Share
More from Franklin Pierce
In war between that power and the United States, without resort on our part to our mercantile marine the means of our enemy to inflict injury upon our commerce would be tenfold greater than ours to retaliate.
The proposition to enter into engagements to forego a resort to privateers in case this country should be forced into war with a great naval power is not entitled to more favorable consideration than would be a proposition to agree not to…
The object of that war was to disenthrall the united colonies from foreign rule, which had proved to be oppressive, and to separate them permanently from the mother country.
If, then, in the progress of its administration there have been departures from the terms and intent of the compact, it is and will ever be proper to refer back to the fixed standard which our fathers left us and to make a stern effort to…





