If the Senator will yield slightly further, that is precisely the point I was making--that ethanol will not be subject to excise taxes. It will require taking money from the general fund to pay for this tax and putting it into the trust fund, so that the trust fund won't be depleted as a result of the fact that ethanol is not subject to the full 18.3 cent tax. If we treat the two equally, we should subject them both to an 18.3-cent tax. If you give ethanol the subsidy, what you are forced to do--exactly what you described--is move general fund money into the trust fund to cover that loss of revenue.
Chris Sununu: “If the Senator will yield slightly further, that is precisely the point I was making--that ethanol will not be subject…”
On the recordJune 3, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the taxation of ethanol and its implications for the trust fund.
Share
More from Chris Sununu
Feb 10, 2025
But the fraud and waste and corruption is so deep and so rampant, it's going to take time. He's not going through a ledger on a million dollar business. He's going through trillions of dollars here.
Feb 10, 2025
It is 23 days in here, guys, 23 days. You're talking about $2.3 billion that was saved last year. These guys are saving $2.3 billion a day. That's incredible.
May 10, 2025
It sounds like they made some headway yesterday, but they’ve got about six weeks to really give the market and some of these small businesses confidence that it’s not going to drag them down.





