I am a cosponsor of H.R. 1827, the Government Waste Corrections Act. I commend our leadership for bringing this bill to the floor. At a time when there is a lot of talk about reducing waste, fraud and abuse in executive branch programs, I am pleased that the House is taking some action. I want to express particular concern about HCFA, and that agency's lax oversight of Medicare contractors. By HCFA's own admission, billions of dollars are lost through waste and abuse each year. Testimony from GAO, as well as the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, has documented that Medicare contractors have improperly paid claims and failed to recoup overpayments to providers. Recently, GAO has cited 'integrity problems' and 'pervasive' fiscal mismanagement among Medicare contractors. This has included such questionable activity as arbitrarily turning off computer audits of claims, altering documents that involved questionable claims, and even falsification of documents and reports to HCFA. Yet these contractors are the very same companies that are supposed to be HCFA's front line force for the identification and recovery of Medicare overpayments. There is an inherent conflict of interest in having Medicare contractors both pay for provider claims and then audit their own performance. This certainly is not the way that insurance companies in Omaha and across the country do business.
Lee Terry: “I am a cosponsor of H.R. 1827, the Government Waste Corrections Act. I commend our leadership for bringing this bill to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about Medicare contractors and the Government Waste Corrections Act.
Share
More from Lee Terry
So one of the reasons I ran for Congress 16 years ago was the high level of reliance on foreign fuel to full our economy and wanted to change that.
Today the House passed a commonsense approach to make our energy more reliable and more affordable. Our vote today would create jobs and secures our energy future by making us dependent on North American resources, not OPEC, Venezuela, or…
And particularly Venezuelan oil bothers me, but do we have a geopolitical responsibility to allow some importation of Venezuelan oil?
The Secretary mentioned he was open to the language that you have inserted, which is a great step forward. Was he open to actually meeting with the delegation on the options that our community is putting forward?





