Political Quotes

Lee Terry: Taxpayers are already paying for legal services for the impoverished. It's the Legal Services Corporation. And the…

On the recordDecember 17, 2010
Taxpayers are already paying for legal services for the impoverished. It's the Legal Services Corporation. And the appropriation for this year, at least as it currently is listed, is $440 million. Perhaps what we're saying here is using the TARP fund as the vehicle and keeping TARP alive is the wrong process here. Perhaps this isn't a TARP or financial services issue. The right way is an appropriation issue. If the majority is upset that there is not enough money going to legal services for the poor, whether it's for foreclosures or other legal issues, the right path would be addressing the Appropriations Committee and asking for additional funds within an already existing process. Committee staff is not aware of whether or not Geithner has now said he is in favor of this bill. We don't know of any conversations, but we have no doubt to disagree with the gentleman from Massachusetts' statement that he has had conversations. We've heard about a letter, but we only have one dated September 13.
Said by
Lee Terry
Nebraska
Source
govinfo.gov
Dec 17, 2010

Editor's note · Context

The speaker discusses funding for legal services for the impoverished and the appropriations process.

Share

More from Lee Terry

Apr 7, 2014

I would also add that you also need to fight for your invention because, as Thomas Moore said, it is naturally given to all men to esteem their own inventions best.

congress.gov
Jun 18, 2014

Bad news is they are completely panicked in how to actually do the plan and how to actually meet the 26 percent mandated reduction.

congress.gov
Jul 30, 2014

This bill is a necessary repair for our vets' damage that was caused by VA workers who were willing to allow veterans to die by denying them care, ostensibly to receive a bonus. Leave no doubt that this is a patch and that the VA requires…

govinfo.gov
Apr 30, 2014

The Secretary mentioned he was open to the language that you have inserted, which is a great step forward. Was he open to actually meeting with the delegation on the options that our community is putting forward?

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation