Once again, in the entire record that's been submitted from the Department of Energy to EPA, the studies that have been done conclude that, in global refineries, CO<INF>2</INF> and total life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions, whether the Keystone XL is built or not, there is no additional CO<INF>2</INF>, no significant CO<INF>2</INF>. That is the exact language in here. To strike that would strike the truth that is set forth in the studies and supplant it with something that doesn't exist in all of the models and studies that have been provided. Madam Chair, I yield back the balance of my time. The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Rush). The question was taken; and the Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it.
Share
More from Lee Terry
I am particularly pleased to see section 401 in this bill, which requires the Chair of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission--currently Allison Macfarlane--to notify the other members of the Commission and the House and Senate Appropriations…
Will the gentleman yield now? Because that is absolutely wrong, and you know it.
I speak today regarding section 131 of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2015. This section is a very important provision that requires the Treasury to report to Congress each month on the number of…
I appreciate all of that. Mr. Chairman, by the way, I would disagree with the last speaker on whether or not there would be no environmental oversight. The State Department has over 10,000 pages of environmental studies that were done…





