There are two realities here. Number one is that on the process of obtaining the bitumen, the crude that comes and will be put into the pipeline, that process is becoming more efficient all the time and decreasing its carbon footprint. But what's produced is equal to a heavy crude. That's what the State Department, under the appropriate rules, stated or concluded, based on the environmental impact studies. It is, in essence, equal to what we're importing from Venezuela today. In essence, it's neutral. That's the State Department's own conclusions and analysis--that it would have no real impact on climate change. So the study has been completed and this amendment is not necessary. It's just another way to keep delaying. I would request a ``no'' vote.
Lee Terry: “There are two realities here. Number one is that on the process of obtaining the bitumen, the crude that comes and will…”
Share
More from Lee Terry
I speak today in support of Mr. Cassidy's bill--the Employee Health Care Protection Act H.R. 3522, This bill is very important to ensure employers and their employees can keep their plan--a broken promise from President Obama. Just last…
Thank you, Representative Brooks. You had mentioned something that we really haven't injected into this particular conversation, and that is the renewables. I am proud that our local power district has 30 percent of their energy produced…
The Secretary mentioned he was open to the language that you have inserted, which is a great step forward. Was he open to actually meeting with the delegation on the options that our community is putting forward?
I disagree. The fact remains that these bad actors are arrogantly manipulating the intellectual property system-and they're getting away with it.





