The majority has described the variety of historic and natural resources that will be preserved and interpreted in the proposed National Heritage Area, and we do not oppose this legislation. We would note, however, that the majority's approach to heritage area legislation has been widely inconsistent. The Republican leadership has gone from opposing heritage areas to approving them in large packages to now approving some of the same ones over again as stand-alone bills. This inconsistency is particularly frustrating to those of us, like myself, with heritage area proposals of our own which have been caught up in this needless legislative red tape and sometimes for several years and several Congresses. It is my hope that once we have approved H.R. 5311, the majority will provide all remaining meritorious heritage area proposals similar consideration. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Jon L. Christensen: “The majority has described the variety of historic and natural resources that will be preserved and interpreted in the…”
Share
More from Jon L. Christensen
I am so proud of what we are doing on behalf of our veterans today and so I rise in strong support of the Military Construction & Veterans Affairs Appropriations bill. In addition to the increase in funding--the largest increase in the…
in 1790, the Non-Intercourse Act was enacted reserving the right to acquire land, or an interest in land, owned by an Indian tribe in the United States. It was intended to prevent third parties from taking advantage of Indians by…
The purpose of H.R. 1736, as introduced by our distinguished colleague from Utah (Mr. Cannon), is to amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 to provide for conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater in…
Yes, he has a great voice and a great talent. We look for him to go to great places in the future. So we have him and we have the Generation Now, and, of course, many of us in the Congressional Black Caucus also had our emerging leaders…





