Madam President, the amendment I have just sent to the desk is on behalf of myself, Senator Bingaman, Senator Kohl, Senator Dorgan, and Senator Levin. This amendment reduces--Madam President, reduces--the total funding level in the bill by $4 billion. This would still allow, I emphasize, this would still allow an increase--increase--in the President's request of $9.0 billion. A $9 billion increase would be allowed even if the Exon amendment is accepted. This is an increase of $155 million --an increase of $155 million--above this year's funding level. To put that in perspective, I have a chart to which I will direct the attention of the Senate. It is headed ``Comparison of the Fiscal Year 1997 Defense Spending Proposals.'' Billions of dollars are on the left side, with the first graph showing $263.2 billion, which would be if we had just taken the whole defense budget and froze it at last year's level, $263.2 billion. Under the Exon proposal, from the standpoint of last year, there would be an increase of something around $200 million or up to $263.4 billion, an increase of about $200 million still going up in national defense over last year's expenditures.
J. Exon: “Madam President, the amendment I have just sent to the desk is on behalf of myself, Senator Bingaman, Senator Kohl…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to reduce defense funding while still allowing for an increase in the President's budget request.
Share
More from J. Exon
last week, I delivered the first of a number of speeches on the fiscal follies of the Dole economic plan. I gave a brief history of voodoo economics in the Reagan-Bush years, its failure, and the economic carnage it left in its wake. I…
Many of my colleagues have given very thoughtful and rigorous descriptions of the economic growth of our Nation under the dedicated leadership of President Clinton. Much of that growth is due to the deficit reduction in the President's…
To the discussion of how we can justify this increase that is not requested by the Pentagon.
I was rather disappointed in the votes we just had. We just had two controversial nominations: One, Mr. Greenspan and one, Ms. Rivlin. I was very pleased to see, although the Greenspan nomination was controversial, it had a strong…





