it may be a misunderstanding and we may be talking by each other on some of these matters. I simply point out what I think the ranking member of the Governmental Affairs Committee just alluded to, and that is the fact that what we are trying to do is leave the process the way it was. There can be no argument but what if you would follow the position taken by the ranking member of the Governmental Affairs Committee, we would not be making a change. The normal order is for the Parliamentarian to rule. The Governmental Affairs Committee bill would differ with that and change it. We objected to this Governmental Affairs proposal during negotiations. We did not control the process. They said they would take out the language, as we understood it, between meetings of the staff.
J. Exon: “it may be a misunderstanding and we may be talking by each other on some of these matters. I simply point out what I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Governmental Affairs Committee bill and its implications for the legislative process.
Share
More from J. Exon
I happen to have the feeling that the comptroller at the Pentagon is a very honest, straightforward individual.
Yes. These provisions stayed out of the bill in conference, as the conferees sought to avoid another challenge on the Senate floor that these provisions violated the Byrd rule. This manifests our intent to keep this bill within the proper…
I will simply say to him that everything that I had just said in my statement in this regard is totally accurate, to the best of my knowledge. With regard to his counterarguments that this is going to help the President of the United…
I consider Senator Mark Hatfield among this pantheon of accomplished public servants. While some may speak highly of Senator Hatfield for his length of service to Oregon and the Nation as a whole, I have been most impressed by the strength…





