my colleagues know that I am a long-time supporter of the balanced budget constitutional amendment. We have tried numerous other remedies, but they have failed to restrain our buy-now-and-pay-later habits. We have only proved how clever we are in creating loopholes and dodging the spending limits. I believe that the balanced budget amendment is our only hope; it is our last hope to break the cycle of runaway Federal spending. However, too many people deal with the balanced budget amendment in the abstract. They will not face up to the harsh reality that goes along with it. They are queasy about telling the American people about the sacrifices that will be involved. The real work begins after we pass the balanced budget amendment. Passage of the legislation is merely a prologue to the really tough decisions that we have to make. We will have to roll up our sleeves and begin in earnest to cut spending. The problem, Mr. President, is this: We have a distorted picture of how much is available for us to cut. I will try in these remarks to let the sunlight of straight talk shine in, revealing fully and honestly our task. It was swept under the rug in the House. We must not allow that to happen in the Senate. Mr. President, the spending pool looks much bigger and deeper than it really is. It would be prudent to test the waters before we dive in.
J. Exon: “my colleagues know that I am a long-time supporter of the balanced budget constitutional amendment. We have tried…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a balanced budget constitutional amendment and the challenges of federal spending.
Share
More from J. Exon
I will simply point out that the Exon amendment still allows for a $9 billion increase over what the President and the Pentagon has recommended. I would think, regardless of the technical details, that most realize and recognize that such…
the provision in this legislation with respect to cost-benefit analysis is unique to the Office of Pipeline Safety. It is not my intent, nor was it ever suggested by any member of the committee that the standard we use in this bill, be…
Mr. President, there is obviously some serious misunderstanding here, because Senator Kyl has not correctly stated the existing law by suggesting that any other nuclear state could conduct a nuclear test after September 30, and before the…
If we want to look at the productivity of America, I think we ought to put that in terms that people can understand: not productivity, but job growth. The percentage of change on an annual basis during the Reagan/Bush years--and I think it…





