Yes, I do believe that the Senator from Montana is correct in making that assumption. The Energy and Natural Resources Committee has a limited amount of mandatory programs under its jurisdiction to target for savings as part of a reconciliation bill. With the exception of privatizing the Power Marketing Administrations, a proposal that was soundly rejected during last year's debate, I might add with the Senator Montana's leadership. I can think of no other policy under their jurisdiction that could generate a $1 billion in savings.
J. Exon: “Yes, I do believe that the Senator from Montana is correct in making that assumption. The Energy and Natural Resources…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing potential savings in mandatory programs during a reconciliation bill debate.
Share
More from J. Exon
To the discussion of how we can justify this increase that is not requested by the Pentagon.
I have not seen the information that the Senator from North Dakota has. I guess I am specifically asking whether or not there were other organizations who hired attorneys or had attorneys there representing those who brought the action.
I happen to have the feeling that the comptroller at the Pentagon is a very honest, straightforward individual.
While the Senator from Virginia and I have not always agreed on all subjects, we have agreed on more than we have disagreed on. I could not help but ask for a moment, if I might, to congratulate the Senator from Virginia for his very…





