Yes, I do believe that the Senator from Montana is correct in making that assumption. The Energy and Natural Resources Committee has a limited amount of mandatory programs under its jurisdiction to target for savings as part of a reconciliation bill. With the exception of privatizing the Power Marketing Administrations, a proposal that was soundly rejected during last year's debate, I might add with the Senator Montana's leadership. I can think of no other policy under their jurisdiction that could generate a $1 billion in savings.
J. Exon: “Yes, I do believe that the Senator from Montana is correct in making that assumption. The Energy and Natural Resources…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing potential savings in mandatory programs during a reconciliation bill debate.
Share
More from J. Exon
Although there are many important things the U.S. Senate is in the process of doing right now, I want to pause for just a moment, if I might, to bring to my colleagues attention that yesterday, history was made at the U.N. General…
To the discussion of how we can justify this increase that is not requested by the Pentagon.
in the limited time that I have remaining I would like to have the opportunity to recap the arguments for the Exon amendment. I would first like to point out for the full understanding of all that this is the only amendment that has any…
This Nation will likely lose the most important Senator of all with regard to national security and foreign policy when my colleague Sam Nunn departs this body. I believe Senator Nunn is one of the greatest leaders of the current era. He…





