I will simply say that the Senator from Indiana is, therefore, saying that the Appropriations Committee is antidefense, the Appropriations Committee will not take a stand for what is right to properly apportion it--make appropriations in a fair manner. I hope that I have more respect for the Appropriations Committee than that, and I do not concede that this is all going to come out of defense, as is the essential claim for the supporters of the Domenici amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing claims about the Appropriations Committee's stance on defense funding.
Share
More from J. Exon
this table shows where the $113 billion--my friend from Iowa said $112 billion; it is $113 billion--shows that these show up on the discretionary add-ons in the President's functional totals, and they exclude defense. Defense is not on the…
I hope that we will listen to the advice of our military leadership and never, ever commit American ground troops to be involved unilaterally or as a part of a United Nations effort to restore order there until and unless there is a…
I intend to support the gift restraints, in all sincerity, as I have supported them for a long, long time. There is some kind of a difference. You can accept a gift and keep it a secret and not say anything about it. Not so with your…
as chairman of the Senate Surface Transportation Subcommittee, I am pleased and honored to introduce the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1994 by the request of the Clinton administration. My highest priority as a member and chairman of the…





