I simply say that I am opposed to the amendment offered by the Senator from Missouri for the reasons that I stated previously. We still do not know the details of where the offsets would come from to make up for the big, huge tax decrease that is being suggested. I believe that, while they are not spelled out in the detail that we would anticipate, by and large, most of the cuts that are being proposed, without specifics from the Senator from Missouri, will fall into discretionary spending. As has been pointed out by the excellent address to the body by the Senator from North Dakota a few moments ago, those particular discretionary spending items are the ones that already have been dramatically reduced.
J. Exon: “I simply say that I am opposed to the amendment offered by the Senator from Missouri for the reasons that I stated…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to tax decreases and discretionary spending during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from J. Exon
I want to emphasize that. But I still say that we are going way too far. I think that is such a reasonable amendment that I cannot imagine it not being endorsed and accepted by the Senate as a whole. In closing, I urge my colleagues to…
If we want to look at the productivity of America, I think we ought to put that in terms that people can understand: not productivity, but job growth. The percentage of change on an annual basis during the Reagan/Bush years--and I think it…
The basic situation that confronts us is that the Kyl amendment, regardless of how well-intentioned, could not possibly be offered at a worse time, as it would adversely affect the nuclear test ban treaty that, right now, is being…
With that fee schedule that you just outlined right from the Surface Transportation Board paper, how many complaints do you think small businessmen, small elevators, would file out of North Dakota?





