I simply say that I am opposed to the amendment offered by the Senator from Missouri for the reasons that I stated previously. We still do not know the details of where the offsets would come from to make up for the big, huge tax decrease that is being suggested. I believe that, while they are not spelled out in the detail that we would anticipate, by and large, most of the cuts that are being proposed, without specifics from the Senator from Missouri, will fall into discretionary spending. As has been pointed out by the excellent address to the body by the Senator from North Dakota a few moments ago, those particular discretionary spending items are the ones that already have been dramatically reduced.
J. Exon: “I simply say that I am opposed to the amendment offered by the Senator from Missouri for the reasons that I stated…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to tax decreases and discretionary spending during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from J. Exon
I was very much interested to see how a judge resented the fact that a U.S. Senator called him asking the reasons for the decision that the judge had rendered. That takes me to the place that, while I recognize the courts as the legitimate…
I have not seen the information that the Senator from North Dakota has. I guess I am specifically asking whether or not there were other organizations who hired attorneys or had attorneys there representing those who brought the action.
as the Democrat leader on the Senate Budget Committee with a long and established record as a fiscal conservative, as Governor of my State longer than any other in its history, and proud of continuing that record for 18 years in the…
Yes. These provisions stayed out of the bill in conference, as the conferees sought to avoid another challenge on the Senate floor that these provisions violated the Byrd rule. This manifests our intent to keep this bill within the proper…





