The smoke has entirely cleared now, and it is clear that the dire predictions that were made about the Exon-Grassley amendment by many sources on both sides of the aisle simply have not come to pass. The clamor in opposition by the President, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the entire Cabinet, and special interest groups were proven unfounded. As Senators will recall, the Exon-Grassley amendment cut a mere $26 billion from our discretionary spending over the next 5 years, spending that will total over $2.7 trillion over the same period of time. Yet, despite the modest goal, the Exon-Grassley amendment was also opposed by the White House, the congressional leadership on both sides of the aisle, and by the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee and the ranking member of that committee. The chairman argued that the Exon-Grassley cuts were general and not specific and, therefore, the Exon-Grassley cuts were improper.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Exon-Grassley amendment and its opposition during budget resolution debates.
Share
More from J. Exon
I simply say to you, Mr. President, that if you do not know Frank Kelso well, then you have missed meeting one of the finest men or women that I think has ever served in the U.S. Navy. We have had him on numerous occasions before the…
I think we are all very troubled with the situation in Bosnia, and troubled we should be. But I do not believe a feel-good amendment, like the one offered by Senators Dole, Lieberman, Mack, Lugar, McCain, Levin, Feingold, Hatch, Dorgan and…
I hope that we will listen to the advice of our military leadership and never, ever commit American ground troops to be involved unilaterally or as a part of a United Nations effort to restore order there until and unless there is a…
I salute the great safety record of the Federal Aviation Administration. Certainly, if you look at the record, you will see that with the diligence, the tenacity, and the determination of the dedicated air traffic controllers of the United…





