I intend to support the gift restraints, in all sincerity, as I have supported them for a long, long time. There is some kind of a difference. You can accept a gift and keep it a secret and not say anything about it. Not so with your salary in the U.S. Senate. If people want their salary cut, and if they so vote but it fails, then I think that they should voluntarily agree to make their tax return, or that portion of their tax return, public each and every year to indicate the seriousness of their convictions.
J. Exon: “I intend to support the gift restraints, in all sincerity, as I have supported them for a long, long time. There is some…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing gift restraints and salary transparency in the Senate.
Share
More from J. Exon
I recommend that all Senators vote in favor of the amendment. I would simply point out that the amendment does nothing more than what the States can already do. I will vote for this amendment, and the one that follows. I will strongly…
If I might add a comment. It seems to me that if there is that much money out there to get this job done, we might seize on that as a means of balancing the Federal budget in 2 years. I thank my friend from North Dakota.
I want to emphasize that. But I still say that we are going way too far. I think that is such a reasonable amendment that I cannot imagine it not being endorsed and accepted by the Senate as a whole. In closing, I urge my colleagues to…
If we want to look at the productivity of America, I think we ought to put that in terms that people can understand: not productivity, but job growth. The percentage of change on an annual basis during the Reagan/Bush years--and I think it…





