On the recordFebruary 10, 2015
It is now widely known that EPA misconstrued this study, hypothesizing heat rate improvements discussed in the study on a cumulative basis when this was not indicated by the study.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Fischer criticizes the EPA's interpretation of a study related to heat rate improvements.
Share & report
More from Deb Fischer
Sep 26, 2023
Can you please talk about the practical implications of a law that would ban or severely restrict the use of AI?
May 9, 2023
I love visiting the Library, and I want to tell you that my staff recently was able to take a field trip and visit the Library.
Mar 21, 2023
Providing access to E15 helps families save money at the gas pump, it is better for our environment, and it boosts our nation's energy security.
Other voices in this conversation
