On the recordJuly 8, 2003
Rapid increases in the cost of medical liability insurance are forcing many physicians to stop performing high-risk procedures, limiting the kind of patients they will see, moving to another State where the liability climate is more favorable, or, simply, they take the option of early retirement. When this occurs, who wins? Who benefits? No one. Everyone loses. Twenty-six States, including my State of Nebraska, have instituted some sort of cap on noneconomic damages. However, some States have had their caps overturned by the courts and other States are barred by their State constitutions from enacting a cap. Medical liability and access to quality health care are national problems. Medical liability reform is needed to help preserve the ability of health care providers to obtain affordable malpractice insurance so we can remain in practice and deal with the health care needs of America. At the same time, we must ensure that victims of medical malpractice continue to have access to the courts and jury awards. This is not an either/or issue. S. 11, the Patients first Act of 2003, is a responsible solution. It is a balanced approach to maintaining access to quality care while preserving the rights of both patients and providers. S. 11 does not cap actual damages. S. 11 caps non-economic damages but defers to current or future state caps.
Source
govinfo.gov




