Let us suppose that the current maximum contaminant level set at the feasible level for a particular contaminant reflects a lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 1,000,000 for a person drinking the water, would the Administrator be authorized by this amendment to consider a less stringent standard that would increase that person's lifetime cancer risk to 1 to 100,000, if substantial costs would be saved?
Bob Kerrey: “Let us suppose that the current maximum contaminant level set at the feasible level for a particular contaminant…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a proposed amendment on water safety standards.
Share
More from Bob Kerrey
You have locked yourselves together into the idea of opposition. Opposition not to an idea but to a man, a man who came to this town green and experienced in our ways. And he wants America to do better, to be better, and to continue to…
I do trust, we`ve -- we know what he wanted. He has been negotiating in good faith. My prediction is that they`ll get a bill, something to the president for signature.
President Clinton, if you`re watching now as I suspect you are, I tell you this: I could not and should not cast the vote that brings down your presidency. You have made mistakes and know it far better than I. But you do not deserve and…





