My amendment is essentially a conforming amendment. It is an amendment that conforms a change we are about to make with the change in the language relating to earnings that occur between age 65 and 69. Senator Moynihan and I have a proposal to eliminate the earnings test from 62 to 65. Some groups are opposed because they are concerned that for low-income working women there could be an increase in the number of women who are under the poverty guidelines as established by the Federal Government. It is an interesting fact. I am not sure of the validity of the forecast. We are changing the program from a retirement program to an old-age program. I support that change. To change Social Security so that it is no longer a retirement-based program is very important. Since 1935, we have either said to workers: You have to retire before you are eligible; or we have said: If you continue to work, there will be a penalty that will occur as a consequence of whatever earnings you have. That is what we are trying to eliminate.
Bob Kerrey: “My amendment is essentially a conforming amendment. It is an amendment that conforms a change we are about to make with…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to Social Security and the earnings test during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Bob Kerrey
I call on the President, 'Get your feet X-rayed. Let's see those X-rays.' I want to see.
President Clinton, if you`re watching now as I suspect you are, I tell you this: I could not and should not cast the vote that brings down your presidency. You have made mistakes and know it far better than I. But you do not deserve and…
We didn't fund that to go half way. We funded it as a project to go all the way to the Moon.
I mean, you got all this attention on Joe Biden but the attention should be focused on the 50 Republican senators who are saying no. No to a piece of legislation, well, take a giant step to address the problem of climate change and give us…





