The Senator's answer is yes, for a new President. He could do it as long as he is satisfied with the definition of ``careful review.'' He could do it prior to December of 2001. According to this amendment, it has to be submitted by 2001. So a careful review could be done before December 2001. I am trying to get the Senator to talk me into voting for his amendment. That is what I am attempting to do here. If the answer is yes, as it appears to be, you may not want President Clinton to make the decision. By the way, I think it is unlikely that he will. He hasn't thus far. I just think it would not be a good thing for us to say that we are going to put a restriction on this President that we are not going to put on the President-elect, whoever that happens to be.
Bob Kerrey: “The Senator's answer is yes, for a new President. He could do it as long as he is satisfied with the definition of…”
On the recordJune 6, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to presidential decision-making.
Share
More from Bob Kerrey
Feb 2, 2015
I came into this commission believing that it's likely we have a real problem with pay and benefits.
Dec 20, 2021
I mean, you got all this attention on Joe Biden but the attention should be focused on the 50 Republican senators who are saying no. No to a piece of legislation, well, take a giant step to address the problem of climate change and give us…
Dec 20, 2021
President Clinton, if you`re watching now as I suspect you are, I tell you this: I could not and should not cast the vote that brings down your presidency. You have made mistakes and know it far better than I. But you do not deserve and…





