I have maintained that United States Forces should not be committed to Bosnia, unless there is a mission with clear goals and objectives. Over the past few weeks, United States military involvement has escalated, to the point that United States planes and bombs are making their mark on the troubled Bosnia/Serb political landscape. Congress must debate our future military role in this region, because the Constitution mandates that Congress raise and provide for our national defense. Yet, should our Nation's military personnel and assets, provided by the sweat and toil of our citizens, become a bargaining chip to reconcile ethnic and religious hatreds that have plagued this region for centuries? For too long, Congress justified not debating this question because of the President's role as our foreign policy leader. But, supporting our President should not mean blind or deaf justification. I call on the House Foreign Affairs Committee to bring to the floor a resolution, and for the leadership in this body to allow for open debate, on the future involvement of our military in Bosnia.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing U.S. military involvement in Bosnia and the need for Congressional debate.
Share
More from Bill Barrett
Any change in registration requirements and the cost associated with such a change would be unwelcome, particularly at a time of such stress in the agricultural economy.
This important legislation will improve transparency in the bond market that will be beneficial to those purchasing these important financial instruments.
The 500,000 farmers who use Farm Credit System institutions for their credit needs are facing terrific challenges brought about by bad weather, low commodity prices and lost export markets.
As chairman of the House Agriculture credit subcommittee, I am extremely sensitive to proposals affecting the providers of credit to farmers and ranchers across our nation.





