unlike Paul Harvey, the Democrats aren't telling--the rest of the story--when it comes to campaign finance reform. They keep hiding the fact that the congressional reform bills will never take effect, unless we increase taxes to pay for campaigns. The bills depend on taxpayer-financed subsidies for candidates, otherwise known as welfare for politicians. In this morning's Roll Call newspaper, the FEC's initial estimate could cost taxpayers $117 million. Mr. Speaker, good old Uncle Sam is going to help voters make up their minds about who to support in elections--no longer trusting the voters to make up their own minds. Instead, Congress should encourage candidates to seek campaign financing from the people who elect them to office. This idea was recently supported by 70 percent of the American public in a recent poll published in the Washington Post. Mr. Speaker, it is time we go back to the table and hammer out real bipartisan reform, that Americans can afford and deserve.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing campaign finance reform and its implications for taxpayers.
Share
More from Bill Barrett
There are no guarantees under this amendment for DARE. As a matter of fact, this is an additional $100 million to be appropriated in addition to the $361 million. There is no guarantee of their funds.
The 500,000 farmers who use Farm Credit System institutions for their credit needs are facing terrific challenges brought about by bad weather, low commodity prices and lost export markets.
I hope your recent comments about bringing a congressional reform bill to the floor this spring, truly reflect a commitment to jump starting our reform efforts. The recommendations from the Joint Committee on the Organization of Congress…
This important legislation will improve transparency in the bond market that will be beneficial to those purchasing these important financial instruments.





