Political Quotes

I just fundamentally do not understand why these people are trading in their future, their children's future, for a few dollars today.

I think we should be moving toward a standard where all nominees for all national security affiliated organization--or affiliated responsibilities--agree that they would do no work for CCP-affiliated organizations in the future.

the idea that judges sitting before this panel should not weigh in on hypothetical cases that are likely to come before the Court, nominees do, nonetheless, have a duty to be very clear about their judicial philosophy, their legal views, and their interpretive principles.

But with respect to legislative intent, when a Congress of 535 often distracted people, 100 in this body and 435 in the other, pass something, you know, by a 2-to-1-ish vote, and it is a part of a large piece of legislation, how do you determine what the intent is when it is 535 people doing something that has many, many different purposes for why somebody might vote yes?