it is vital that we work to protect grazing on public and private lands. In fact, communities throughout the United States depend on it. Millions of acres of lands within the NLCS have grazing. The NLCS is a direct threat to grazing for these several reasons. This is not by accident. Advocates who testified in support of H.R. 2016 list grazing as a ``threat'' to NLCS lands. This bill, in fact, directs the Secretary of Interior to manage NLCS lands similar to the National Park Service. This is a problem because there is no grazing on National Park Service lands. Outside groups will use this to drive off ranchers through lawsuits. This is harmful not only to ranchers themselves, a very difficult industry at this time, but to the communities in which they reside. It is also harmful ultimately to the American consumer. I urge others to vote ``no'' on H.R. 2016 and encourage a balanced policy as a result.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about H.R. 2016 and its impact on grazing rights.
Share
More from Adrian Smith
Parental empowerment is more important than ever before. It is incumbent upon us to come together and put forward creative solutions to ensure all children can access a quality education, no matter their background or where they live.
tax day is usually a very painful reminder of how much of one's hard-earned money goes out the door. Today would have been no different from the past if Democrats had gotten their way and if Republicans had failed to pass the Working…
I am pleased that this committee has already advanced legislation I introduced with Representative Steel to permanently extend first-dollar HDHP coverage for telehealth.
Since its inception in 2000, the AGOA Program has been the cornerstone of U.S. trade and economic engagement with sub-Saharan Africa.





