I would like to state for the record the prior remarks shared were inaccurate. The fact of the matter is, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act actually resulted in more revenues to the Treasury. Let's not forget that. And the fact of the matter is, a growing economy will do far more for the American people than new government programs that we can't afford. We are standing here now, and of course, I think we should make good on our debts and make good on our obligations. This bill is not the solution. Instead of focusing on basics of governing, the majority has chosen to spend the past 10 months kind of arguing here and there--a lot actually--first passing their $2 trillion inflation catalyst at the beginning of the year, and now arguing among themselves how to spend another $5 trillion. This bill is clearly not the solution. This bill isn't bipartisan. It was brought to the floor solely by Democrats and reflects their take- it-or-leave-it approach to governing. It does nothing to address our Nation's spending problem. It is a blank check which allows the majority to spend as much as they want in the coming months unrestrained by a true debt limit for the duration of this Congress. Democrats control government and can immediately raise the debt ceiling right now. There is a better way, however, than this particular bill. Madam Speaker, I urge a ``no'' vote.
Share
More from Adrian Smith
Our bill, the Educational Choice for Children Act, is an innovative policy mechanism to provide deserving students of all backgrounds with more options to fund their education needs, something we should all be able to agree on.
I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 143, YEA on Roll Call No. 144, and YEA on Roll Call No. 145. ____________________
Today, I rise to recognize Third District native Pete McClymont for his contributions to the Nebraska beef industry. Pete was raised on a farm and ranching operation near Holdrege, Nebraska, and has maintained a lifelong commitment to…
This legislation would take a parcel of land into restricted fee status for the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe.





