One final question I ask of the Senator. Isn't the Senator concerned, as I am, that the $4,000-per-hour fee cap that is supposed to be a cap, supposed to be a ceiling, could well turn into a floor, and the fact is that we will see unconscionable attorneys' fees under this amendment? The Senator viewed $1,000 an hour as a limit and now this has $4,000 an hour as a limit. Isn't it possible that we will see absolutely unconscionable attorneys' fees out of an amendment like this?
Kent Conrad: “One final question I ask of the Senator. Isn't the Senator concerned, as I am, that the $4,000-per-hour fee cap that is…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a proposed amendment on attorneys' fees during Senate debate.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
We did a whole series of things in our Social Security reform not to discourage people from working, but to encourage them to continue working if they are able to do so.
We admire that, and I can say on both sides of the aisle, people recognize the job he did as Budget Committee Chairman.
Can I just respond quickly, Mr. Chairman, and say when Simpson-Bowles went down, a group of six of us in the Senate, three Democrats, three Republicans, were asked by leadership to see if we couldn't come up with a way forward to adopt the…
It takes guts to do that, and Chairman Arrington, you have certainly led the charge on having a commission.





