Let me say briefly on this, you can extend all the tax breaks that have been described in this amendment if you pay for them. The problem with the Kyl amendment is he does not pay for it. Over $70 billion is not paid for, goes on the deficit, which will drive this budget, which now balances in 2012, right out of balance. We will be going right back into the deficit ditch. Please, colleagues, let us resist this amendment. People could support it if it was paid for, but it is not.
Kent Conrad: “Let me say briefly on this, you can extend all the tax breaks that have been described in this amendment if you pay for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Kyl amendment on the budget and deficit.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
Can I just respond quickly, Mr. Chairman, and say when Simpson-Bowles went down, a group of six of us in the Senate, three Democrats, three Republicans, were asked by leadership to see if we couldn't come up with a way forward to adopt the…
I wish I could look you in the eye and say, you know, if we just had the will, we could reverse this, and we could go back to a time when defined benefit plans were on the increase. I do not think that is in the cards.
I do, and I made that argument to the commission, and others on the commission made some of the points that you are making now.
We did a whole series of things in our Social Security reform not to discourage people from working, but to encourage them to continue working if they are able to do so.





