For precisely the same reason that the Senator has given for his including extending the middle-class tax cuts when he last wrote a budget resolution in 2006. It would have covered the years 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011. The Senator included the extension of those middle-class tax cuts, just as I have done, because it was a 5-year budget resolution, and then the Senator's side did not execute, just as we did not last year, because there was no necessity to do it because those tax provisions do not expire until 2010. This is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. You extended the middle-class tax cuts in your 2006 resolution and then did not execute because there was no need to do so because those tax cuts don't expire until 2010. That is precisely what we have done.
Kent Conrad: “For precisely the same reason that the Senator has given for his including extending the middle-class tax cuts when he…”
On the recordMarch 11, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the inclusion of middle-class tax cuts in budget resolutions during a floor debate.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
Apr 4, 2017
I do, and I made that argument to the commission, and others on the commission made some of the points that you are making now.
Oct 18, 2023
Can I just respond quickly, Mr. Chairman, and say when Simpson-Bowles went down, a group of six of us in the Senate, three Democrats, three Republicans, were asked by leadership to see if we couldn't come up with a way forward to adopt the…
Oct 18, 2023
We admire that, and I can say on both sides of the aisle, people recognize the job he did as Budget Committee Chairman.
Mar 3, 2021
All the talk in the world doesn't matter if you don't actually get something done in the real world.





