I just go back to this question. It does strike me, given the rise of terrorist activity not only in this country but around the world, that when you put in motion from 80 different sites around the country, from 41 States, thousands of these casks headed for one location, that if you were a terrorist organization--it would take very little calculation to figure out where this is most vulnerable--you would have the potential here for a terrorist organization when this stuff is most vulnerable, when it is in motion, when it is in transit, to attack either a train or a truck and get possession of this material and thereby be able to threaten dozens of cities in America. I must say, when I have talked to security people--again, I talked to a person who was in the Secret Service--with respect to when they think something that they are guarding is most vulnerable, they said without question it is when it is in transit, when it is on the move. That is when it is the most vulnerable.
Kent Conrad: “I just go back to this question. It does strike me, given the rise of terrorist activity not only in this country but…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the vulnerabilities of transporting hazardous materials in the context of rising terrorist threats.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
all the talk in the world doesn't matter if you don't actually get something done in the real world.
We all know that Social Security is going to have to be dealt with, or we are going to face by 2034 at the latest--many of us believe it will be earlier than that---an across-the-board 23-percent cut.
I have seen retired schoolteachers have to go back to work in their 70's after their husbands have died or their wives have died.
Can I just respond quickly, Mr. Chairman, and say when Simpson-Bowles went down, a group of six of us in the Senate, three Democrats, three Republicans, were asked by leadership to see if we couldn't come up with a way forward to adopt the…





