But as the Senator's chart demonstrates, if you adjust that for inflation, what your GDP figure does, there is virtually no difference in tax burden--virtually none. There is 18.6 percent in GDP tax burden in 2007 and 18.8 percent in 2012.
Kent Conrad: “But as the Senator's chart demonstrates, if you adjust that for inflation, what your GDP figure does, there is virtually…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax burden in relation to GDP during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
I wish I could look you in the eye and say, you know, if we just had the will, we could reverse this, and we could go back to a time when defined benefit plans were on the increase. I do not think that is in the cards.
We admire that, and I can say on both sides of the aisle, people recognize the job he did as Budget Committee Chairman.
I urge you to vote for the confirmation of Dave Turk. I urge you to do it quickly.
Can I just respond quickly, Mr. Chairman, and say when Simpson-Bowles went down, a group of six of us in the Senate, three Democrats, three Republicans, were asked by leadership to see if we couldn't come up with a way forward to adopt the…





