It was a disappointing way to do business. I think the result has suffered. I will follow up on the point the Senator made about slower productivity growth. We saw in the first quarter, instead of 1 percent increase, it was negative one-tenth of 1 percent. If we were to have 1 percent less productivity growth per year, the projected surplus of $5.6 trillion would be reduced to $3.2 trillion. That is the hard reality of how dramatically affected the ultimate results are by very small changes in the assumptions in these forecasts. That is something we should all understand.
Kent Conrad: “It was a disappointing way to do business. I think the result has suffered. I will follow up on the point the Senator…”
On the recordMay 9, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of productivity growth on projected budget surpluses.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
Oct 18, 2023
I thought he was an outstanding Committee Chairman, and my former intern has succeeded him in his Congressional seat.
Apr 4, 2017
I do, and I made that argument to the commission, and others on the commission made some of the points that you are making now.
Oct 18, 2023
Can I just respond quickly, Mr. Chairman, and say when Simpson-Bowles went down, a group of six of us in the Senate, three Democrats, three Republicans, were asked by leadership to see if we couldn't come up with a way forward to adopt the…
Oct 18, 2023
We admire that, and I can say on both sides of the aisle, people recognize the job he did as Budget Committee Chairman.





